Convention of Statesmen

ads

There's No Crying in Baseball . . . or Politics

Apparently Hilary had a little break down a couple of days ago, a calculated one, as she wept over the fact that she's trying to change America and doesn't want to see us fall back. Of course, she immediately segued that into an attack on Barack Obama, so I'm not sure how sincere it was. Sheesh woman! If you want to be President of the United States of America you better at least act like one . . . even though I wouldn't vote for you even if you were the only candidate in the race. There's no crying in politics, at least not in public.

New Hampshire . . . I am truly astonished at the number of Republicans who voted for a very liberal John McCain. I hadn't realized that the core principles of this nation, laid out by the framers of the constitution, have become so passé. John McCain and Rudy Giuliani occupy the same space in the Republican party. Pro-choice (yes, that means they support women being able to choose whether or not to murder their children in utero while facing no consequences,) pro-amnesty . . . it didn't work when Ronald Reagan tried it, witness the 12,000,000 illegal immigrants in this nation now! Although McCain says he's changed his mind, now he says he's tough on border security and illegal immigration. I guess I'd believe that if he weren't still trying to push through his immigration bill co-sponsored by Chappaquiddick Teddy Kennedy which is an outright betrayal of the American people, if the southern border fence hadn't just been completely shot down by Congress.

To give McCain his due, he carried New Hampshire against President Bush, as well as Michigan, I believe. So it will be interesting to see where the Republican race goes from here. Huckabee took Iowa and will take anywhere there is a strong evangelical vote. McCain will take the exceedingly liberal Republicans if Giuliani doesn't (had Giuliani made an effort in New Hampshire Romney would have won, because McCain and Giuliani would have split the liberal vote.)

Rush Limbaugh said, "New Hampshire is not a conservative bellwether. Iowa's caucus is weird. After NH, the race for the GOP begins." Let's hope he's right.

I'm startled to see the direction this nation is headed. On the Democratic side we have Clinton or Obama . . . neither inspire confidence but rather abject terror as I fully believe the democracy/republic set up by the founding fathers is an incredible thing and not in need of socialist influence or downright conversion to communism.

When Clinton's husband was in office, just ONE of the things he did as president horrified me, and there were many. He signed all of America's rivers, streams, creeks and lakes over to the United Nations. The only two states who kept the rights to their own waters? Idaho and Utah, thanks to Helen Chenowith (I believe it was) and Chris Cannon, my congressman. Clinton sold America down the river, so to speak. He robbed us of our constitutional rights in such an insidious manner that many Americans didn't even notice because they were blinded by his Southern charm, except he made my skin crawl and I found nothing charming about that. Are we really ready for another Clinton presidency? Will there be anything left of America when she's done? Of course, Obama is no better as there is very little difference between the two.

On the Republican side we have one man who has stayed loyal and married to the woman he fell in love with as a teenager, through sickness (her MS) and health. We have one man who puts in however many hours, days, weeks, months and years it takes to do the job right. We have one man whose policies prove he is the only complete conservative in the pack, hence his National Review endorsement. We have one man who has a proven track record in turning around failing companies, the Olympics and the deficit of Massachusetts, pulling that legislature together as never before. We have one man whose ethics, honesty and integrity have never been called into question. We have a man whose faith in God surpasses all the other candidates . . . and yet, Mitt Romney is bashed unceasingly for his faith, his Mormon faith. Why?

Don't we want a president who will remain faithful to his wife instead of having sex in the oval office with an intern? Don't we want a president who can't be bought? Don't we want a president with a strong sense of right and wrong, who simply cannot be bought? Don't we want a president who has proven he can fix broken things, whether be companies, Olympics, states or the nation? Don't we want a president we can believe in, we can trust? I do! That's Mitt Romney.

This past Sunday, Fox News held a GOP debate. Mitt Romney displayed presidential qualities, he remained calm, cool and collected. The "white hot rage" Huckabee's campaign says he has for Romney was rolling off him in waves. McCain showed serious disdain for Romney, pulling out his "I ran the largest unit in the military and I did it for patriotism, not profit." Thompson and Giuliani simply didn't show up . . . meaning, they were there but they weren't inspiring. It was a three-way dog fight and only one remaind the gentleman, setting forth his vision for America . . . Mitt Romney. He said Washington D.C. is broken and it is. Of every person running for office right now, there is only one with a proven track record for fixing broken things . . . you guessed it, Mitt Romney. He's still the only one that has a prayer of fixing what's wrong with this nation. He did it in Massachusetts . . . he can do it in Washington.

What kind of president does America need for 2008 and beyond? A University of PA professor of goverment studies recently described the manager we need and his description matches Mitt Romney to the "T". A clear evaluation of what America really needs to get itself back on track was properly identified by Donald F. Kettl, director of the Fels Institute of Government at the University of Pennsylvania, when he said the following: "The next president will have no choice but to confront management improvement. Both 9/11 and Katrina made the searing case that management failures can have punishing implications." Dr. Kettl runs a web-site that tracks promises made by candidates. This will allow Americans to track how well an elected official lives up to their campaign promises. The DR. has also inadvertently identified for the American people, what they should be looking for in their next Chief Executive Officer. Ironically, based on Dr. Kettl's evaluation and comment, he has actually given a ringing endorsement to the Mitt Romney management style. That style would be an advantage to the next president who could use such talents to truly make a difference for this nation for decades to come.

Posted by Stephen L Ralston at 2008-01-02 22:33:23 ~ Posted on the Five Brothers Blog

Yesterday on Fox News they were interviewing a woman who represented a candidate matching site . . . and I'm sorry I can't remember the website, I've looked all morning. But, you indicate your stance on a number of issues and they match with the candidate who most closely matches you. This is what this less-than-brilliant woman said: "The candidates need to stop focusing on the issues and focus on charm and likability. That's what people really care about, personality."

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I simply refuse to believe the 20 to 30's folks will only vote someone in based on their looks and personality? Tell me it isn't so! Really, I'm serious, tell me it isn't so. The leader of the free world is NOT chosen in a personality contest, is he or she?

So Mitt Romney lost New Hampshire by a narrow margin (McCain 37% - Romney 32%.) I really thought he'd overtake McCain, but he didn't just quite pull it off. Governor Romney did point out that with the win in Wyoming, coming in close seconds in Iowa and New Hampshire give him the most votes of any Republican candidate overall . . . he has a point.

I don't know where this election is going. There are no clear front runners . . . still. Super Tuesday, February 5th will tell the tale, in the end. Or at least that's what Giuliani is hoping. So am I, frankly.

The next primary is January 15 in Michigan. Both the Democrats and Republicans will go to the polls. Come on Michigan, don't let me down.

The Republican candidates are debating again on Thursday night - January 10th, on Fox News. I recommend everyone watch it and decide for yourselves. Of course, I'll post it on my blog the next day too . . . but it's good to see all the interaction between the candidates. Really good.

Go Mitt! I'm in your corner all the way. I still want a Romney/Giuliani ticket.

Thanks to FoxNews.com for the pictures . . . clearly worth a 1,000 words.
There's No Crying in Baseball . . . or Politics There's No Crying in Baseball . . . or Politics Reviewed by Unknown on Wednesday, January 09, 2008 Rating: 5

10 comments:

  1. We CANNOT let Hillary Clinton win this election. Sure it would be nice to have a woman for president, but I think that it would be a REALLY bad thing! I think that Mitt would be great, he has alot of good ideas that I am sure would become policy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Candace,

    Is it just me or does it drive you crazy when the pundits keep saying Mitt is done? Hello, he has the most delegates. The pundits conveniently ignore his Wyoming win as well. Fortunately, Mitt is a businessman who knows that when things don't work according to his original plan, he changes strategies. He also has the money and the organization to keep plugging away and to keep earning the delegates necessary to earn the nomination.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unfortunately, I think personality and charm are exactly what the younger voters are looking for. The other night on our local news they asked a young man who had attended his first caucus why he stood where he did (behind Obama, BTW), and he said all his friends did, so it was peer pressure! Oh my. This isn't high school sweetie, some time you have to begin to think for yourself! Unfortunately, I'm a Republican in a family of rabid Democrats, so I'm a very vocal Mitt supporter and I hope that between now and Feb 5, he can kick some serious booty! And Candace, you know why they're persecuting him because of his faith, it's because of his faith. We're at that point in time that all Mormons are being looked at with distrust (again). When you have all the attributes that people want in their hearts, but can't live, then you're the enemy. I'm sure more prayers are being offered in Mitt Romney's behalf than all other candidates combined.

    ReplyDelete
  4. While we hope our voters aren't going for popularity alone, I think a certain percentage of them do vote based on looks and charm. That's because they haven't taken the time to study the issues and they go with their spur of the moment feelings.

    But hey, Mitt is obviously the best looking in this race, so that could work in our favor . . .

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks Candace, I always appreciate the commentary.

    If you look at the exit polls, McCain got the independents and Huckabee gets the evangelicals, and the conservatives vote for Mitt.

    With the next debate in SC, I'm sure we can expect to hear more, "Vote for me cuz I'm an evangelical like you. And, uh, don't the Mormons believe that (insert favorite anti-Mormon cliche here)," from Huckabee.

    It will be a sad day indeed if a religious bigot or liberal republican win the nomination.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought Romney was going to pull it off in NH after his great performance at the debate, but didn't happen. Clearly, the other candidates don't like Romney either. Mitt has a lot of ties in Michigan, but independents can vote in the MI primary, just like NH, which probably would go for McCain, so that is not good for Mitt, and there are a lot of evangelicals in the western part of the state that seems would favor Huckabee. But I have to say, Mitt's speech after his loss in NH was inspirational. He needs to keep getting that message out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Actually, there IS crying in politics:

    here
    here
    here
    here
    and
    here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. NG - I checked out the links. Clinton doesn't count . . . he's still crying cause he got caught. President Bush, out of politics by this point, tearing up with pride over his son, Jeb. President George W. Bush tearing up at a Medal of Honor ceremony, completely appropriate. And again with Mitt Romney:

    "Mitt Romney's eyes filled with tears today as the Republican presidential contender recalled watching the casket of a soldier killed in Iraq return to the United States and imagined if it were one of his five sons. ~ Time Magazine"

    Again, that doesn't count. Hillary was crying because she was losing. Wah, wah, wah.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Way to go, Candace!!! These are my thoughts exactly. I can't think of a more able person than Mitt Romney ever having been in the running for President of this country. Like you, I'm praying Michigan brings sense to the table.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Seriously?

    I think its a contradiction to say we shouldn't vote based on personality or charisma right after saying "there's no crying in politics." And I think that its extremely sexist the way the media treats Hillary and brow beats her for the tiniest little things. One day its don't vote for her because her breasts look lopsided in the angle she was sitting for that interview, or the next its that she has a bad haircut. And now its "OMG she got a little misty on TV."

    The focus should be on the issues, not on the personality nuances of the people running, whether its tears in Hilary's case or "having a hot wife" in the case of another candidate.

    The very reason that this is the first time America has ever had a woman get this close to taking the Oval Office is because America is still so sexist that they can't get past the idea that a woman is somehow inferior or incapable of leadership skills because of her feminine, God-given sensibilities, in this case crying on TV.

    And America is still so sexist and obsessed with objectifying and subjugating women that our presidential race is affected by whether the breasts of the women running are even and how great the breasts of the women married to the men who are running are.

    It's all ridiculous and America needs to get over breasts, tears, blue shirts vs. white shirts, southern accents vs. white teeth and start thinking about what really matters--which is finding a person who is capable of leading our country, and this year I'm not convinced such a person is even running...

    So maybe that person isn't Hillary, but I'm sure as heck not basing that on whether she gets teary on TV or how her blazer fits. I'm looking at her voting record, her political history, what she's said about the issues, what groups she affiliates with, her ability to get her point across and stand her ground in the crossfire of an extremely patriarchal system.

    End rant.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for dropping by my blogspot and visiting with me. I love reading your thoughts on my posts. Please be sure and comment before you leave.