Monday, December 30, 2013

The Mormon Effect by the Federalist Press

I have been looking for an original article posted shortly after the 2012 presidential election that was written. It was originally published on the Canada Free Press called "Smart Mormons" by Mike Jensen (22 January 2012). The Federalist has reprinted the article in its entirety:


During the 2012 presidential campaign, that awesomely deep well of perpetual wisdom, Alec Baldwin, proclaimed that if Barack Obama were not black, his vote total would have been 20 percent higher.

People of real intelligence realize that the opposite was probably true: if he had been white, his vote total would have been 20 percent lower. The African-American voting bloc combined with enough whites suffering from liberal guilt guaranteed a higher vote total for Obama.

The truth of the matter is, if Mitt Romney had not been a Mormon, his vote total might very well have been significantly higher.

In fact, according to a Gallop poll released in June of last year, while 4 percent of people said they would not vote for a black president, a full 22 percent said they would not vote for a Mormon. In fact, only atheists and gays ranked higher.

So Baldwin probably had it backwards, which he usually does, so that comes as no surprise.

What did come as a surprise to me is why people would have such negative views of Mormons. I have known lots of them in my life, and in most cases they have been hard-working, kind, generous family-oriented people—just the kind of people this country used to value (and maybe that’s the problem right there.)

Mormons have intrigued me ever since Mike Huckabee back in 2007 claimed that Mormons believe that Jesus and Satan are brothers. With the recent election over, I decided to check out Mormons a bit more.

My hope in doing this was to explain to readers who Mormons are and whether or not 22 percent of the people were justified in opposing having a Mormon president.

But instead I’m going to share an intriguing bit of Mormon theology I learned that I think makes them perhaps the most politically wise human beings on the planet. Ironically, this story stems from that Huckabee quote about the relationship between Jesus and the devil, but the lesson to be learned is one that, regardless of our political or religious views, we would all be wise to consider.

So here’s what I learned: Mormons, unlike most other Christian sects, believe that all humans lived a life before mortality. They call this the pre-existence or pre-earth life. At birth a veil is placed over our minds so that we don’t remember it (you’ll see why in a minute).

In this pre-earth life, we were all in the presence of God as His spirit children. Jesus was there—the first-born of God’s spirit children, and a leader in the councils in Heaven. Lucifer was also there, and was another leader among the children of God. He was called a “son of the morning.”

At some point in this existence, the Father called all of His children together to explain how things worked. All of His children would have to leave His presence and come to earth for a period of testing. The goal was to see if we would live a righteous life even when we had to live by faith, as we would no longer be able to remember God or heaven (that’s the reason for the veil).

If we would live a righteous life, we would be given the opportunity to return and live with God forever. Otherwise we would forfeit that chance, because no unclean thing can live in God’s presence. However, God knew that we would all make mistakes, so he would provide a Savior for the world. This Savior would live a sinless life, and because of that, he would qualify to pay for the sins of the world through what would be called the “Atonement.” If people would sincerely repent of their sins, then the Atonement would essentially erase their sins, and they could still return and live with God. The Father called for volunteers to be this savior, and two stepped forward: Jesus and Lucifer.

Lucifer said that he would be the savior and he would force everybody to live righteously, thus guaranteeing that all of God’s spirit children would return to Him in heaven [and he, Lucifer would receive all the credit/glory]. Jesus said that He would follow the Father’s plan and allow God’s children their free agency [and all the glory would go to God]. They could choose for themselves whether to live righteously and take advantage of the Atonement or whether to live in sin and forfeit the opportunity to return and live with God.

God rejected Lucifer’s plan, causing Lucifer to rebel and declare war on God. One-third of God’s spirit children joined Lucifer in this rebellion. In the end, the rebellion failed and Lucifer and his followers were cast out of heaven. They came to earth without bodies and now, continuing the war they started in heaven, they tempt men to do evil to one another and lose out on the chance to return to God. [Luke 10:18; Revelation 12:9; Isaiah 14:12]

PAY ATTENTION HERE; THIS IS THE GOOD PART

Now, any traditional Christians reading this will see similarities to their own belief system. Most traditional Christians believe that Lucifer lived in heaven as an angel, but then declared war on God and was cast out. However, the causes for that war are not necessarily clear in traditional Christian theology.

That is where Mormon theology is so intriguing. For Mormons, the greatest of all battles, the war in heaven, was fought over LIBERTY—or as they call it, “free agency.”Lucifer wanted to take it away, while God demanded that humans have it.

Although a Mormon might balk at my making comparisons between their religious beliefs and modern politics (and as I said earlier, every Mormon I’ve ever known was a very good person, so I apologize to any I offend), I see a direct correlation here. For a Mormon, the battle for liberty is not unique to this life; it is the core battle of the ages. Lucifer lost the war in heaven (he really thought he could beat God?), but the war continues on earth. So seeing the government become more and more tyrannical is not just a political concern; it’s a fundamental, eternal concern.

I’m inspired by this Mormon theological idea: God intended for humans to be free to make our own choices and live with the consequences of those choices. The Founding Fathers of this country said essentially the same thing in the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evidence, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

My study of Mormonism has not only given me newfound respect for this people and their religion; it has also made me evaluate my own attitude towards the liberty that seems to be slipping through all of our fingers. Is this just something that is nice to have, and for which I thank the Founding Fathers? Or is it really something that is endowed by God, and that He expects me to fight for. According to Mormon theology, I already fought for this once. The fact that I’m here says that I was on God’s side in the war in heaven, and fought for liberty.

A Mormon might ask, why should any of us be less willing to fight for it here than we were there?

Reprinted from “SMART MORMONS,” Canada Free Press By Mike Jensen, January 22, 2013

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

The Purpose of StatesmenPAC

The purpose of StatesmenPAC is to bring to the hearts of Americans the importance of our historic values which made this nation great.

We are living in historic times in America, but are hedged in by a mediocre Congress made up of mediocre individuals who gain more by going along with narrow, monied powers than by solving problems. StatesmenPAC is seeking 200+ men and women across America to run for Congress in 2014. They want people who have proven themselves through the fires of time and who have emerged with competence, integrity and strength. They expect statesmen to limit their contributions to less than the legally de minimus $200.

StatesmenPAC works with PSBtxt.com which provides communication tools, principally push texting, fundraising, polling, forums and grassroots development, thereby enabling candidates to communicate with their constituents as they are running for office and after, relying on the hearts of Americans to come together on national priorities. PSBtxt is developing grassroots across America, helping Americans understand that we will be heard if we simply unite in purpose.

StatesmenPAC uses texting tools and discussion forums on national issues to strengthen the link between candidates, their campaigns, their volunteers, their small funders and, ultimately, their constituents.

Through PSBtxt, texting tools candidates are able to fundraise, poll, push information to voters and engage them with contests. This is all done within seconds. A SinglePoint worldwide study on texting showed that 98% of people read a text within 3 seconds to 3 minutes. This is an astronomical read rate, with an equally astounding 70.6% click through rate.

PSBtxt has formed a partnership with StatesmenPAC to provide tools and best practices for 200 statesmen candidates for the US House and Senate in 2014. Just by running they will change the status quo. StatesmenPAC believes the election of a great many of them is likely as people all over the country ask themselves why their congressman doesn’t measure up.

We believe the election will be followed by a time of great prosperity and a restoration of American robustness.
John F. Kennedy said, “Let us not seek of the Democrat answer or the Republican answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept responsibility for the future.”
StatesmenPAC seeks men and women willing and able to shoulder the responsibility for the future. PSBtxt seeks both candidates and to empower the grassroots. Imagine, if you will, the ability to respond to a text, shaping the national debate.

Text JOHNADAMS to 33733 and PSBTXT to 33733 to become part of the movement to restore prosperity to America.



Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Friday, December 27, 2013

Are Healthcare Compacts the Answer to Obamacare

Actual affordable healthcare is one of the key issues I feel can be addressed. Breitbart.com has a thoughtful article on an interstate compact called The Health Care Compact that is worth debating and exploring:

by Leo Linbeck III

There is no need, at this point, to belabor the problems with the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. Suffice it to say that millions of Americans have been negatively impacted by the new law, and that number will grow in the coming months and years.

The question now is what to do about it. Democrats are dividing into two camps: those who want to stand by the President’s signature achievement until the bitter end, and those who are running from Obamacare, trying to save their political careers.

At the same time, Republicans are just trying to stay out of the way. Having voted against the bill, regained control of the House in its wake, and attempted to repeal the ACA multiple times, they are enjoying their moment of vindication. They rightfully fear that any attempt to “fix” Obamacare will allow Democrats and the media to portray them as “co-owning” any problems that occur downstream. And there will be more problems.

But while the Republicans are in a much stronger position than they were at the time of the government shutdown, they are still in a strategic quandary. On the one hand, Obamacare is exacting a very real human toll in the country, and the longer they stand aside doing nothing, the more they will be painted as insensitive and unresponsive to the damage. And many voters, in the midst of a personal crisis, don’t really care who caused the problem. They just want it fixed.

On the other hand, once Republicans provide specifics on the “replace” part of their “repeal and replace” plan, Democrats will switch from defense to offense. If history serves as a guide, we can expect Republicans to propose a policy cooked up in one of the top Washington DC conservative think tanks: Cato, Heritage, AEI, Manhattan, etc. Or perhaps they will dust off Rep. Paul Ryan’s free market plan for reforming health care. But no matter its provenance, their plan will be perceived as pushing a “conservative” solution for the country, designed and implemented in Washington, DC.

Such a move, once made, will put Democrats back on their home court, attacking Republican plans as heartless and greedy. And these attacks will continue into the 2014 election cycle.

So what can be done? Well, it might help to ask, “If you had to come up with the ideal plan going forward, what would it look like?” It might have the following elements:

Read More on Breitbart.com

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Judicial Tyranny Rules Against Utah

It is with a heavy heart I write this blog post today. On Friday, Judge Robert Shelby of the 10th Circuit Court indulged in a gross overreach of his power, violating the 10th Amendment rights of Utah, and overturned the 3rd Amendment to Utah's Constitution. Sixty-six percent of Utahns voted for this Amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Amendment 3 reads:
1. Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman.
2. No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.
An article in the Deseret News read:
SALT LAKE CITY — A federal judge Friday struck down Utah's voter-approved constitutional amendment — which defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman — finding that it violates rights to due process and equal protection as set forth in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 
Although the U.S. Supreme Court upheld earlier this year that it would be left up to the states to decide whether they would accept gay marriage within their borders.

The 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution reads:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 8), nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Judge Shelby not only ignored the SCOTUS ruling, but also the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the land. In so doing, Shelby followed a long line of judges who feel they are allowed to legislate from the bench. It is called judicial tyranny, and it was in fine form in the 10th Circuit Court on Friday.

Utah was founded by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who fled America so they could worship according to the dictates of their own conscience. For more than a century Utah's communities were defined by that which was important to them: God, family and country. We knew we'd begun the battle for freedom in heaven, and it continues today, seven thousand plus years later.

THE FAMILY is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity. Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. Successful marriages and families are established and maintained on principles of faith, prayer, repentance, forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, and wholesome recreational activities. By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. Disability, death, or other circumstances may necessitate individual adaptation. Extended families should lend support when needed.
On Friday, when Shelby decided to defy his oath of office, he chose to tell the 66% who voted to maintain traditional marriage, finding it so important we amended our state constitution, that the voice of "We the People" was of no consequence to him. He chose to rule against thousands of years of precedent, and the U.S. Constitution. He should be promptly impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, but I fear they haven't the backbone for that either.

This has happened in state after state. The people vote to maintain traditional marriage, and the courts overturn it. It is a huge mistake and one that will cost America dearly in the long run. I defy history to show one incident where the embracing of homosexuality served society well.

Marriage, as a sacrament, is the sole purview of churches and has been for millennia. The federal government pushed its way in, in order to gain a piece of the pie, and messed it up as they have everything else. It has been suggested, and I am seeing the wisdom of it, that the government get out of the marriage business altogether. Leave it to the churches to manage, and then the issue of protection is no longer of importance.

Yes, there are many who will castigate me for this position, but mine is based on religion, history and current law as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States, not by the 10th Circuit Court.

To date, Robert Shelby denied the oral emergency motion to stay, but has agreed to hear the written motion to stay his decision in an expedited fashion. This will, again, find it's way to SCOTUS where they should strike down the 10 Circuit Court decision to overturn our 3rd Amendment, if they follow their own decision rendered earlier this year.

All in all, there are a huge amount of saddened individuals in the state of Utah.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

BYU Fans From Across the World

Alvin played for BYU in the 1980's. I went to school there at the same time. We are both avid BYU Football fans, and often Basketball as well. Cougar Blue runs through our blood! Looks like Hyundai decided the BYU fans were the loyal, faithful and true. Check it out!

 

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Thursday, December 5, 2013

America Will Not Fail, Watch and See

The day always comes where we believe we cannot go on. It often seems this fight for America is being lost on a daily basis, but nothing could be further from the truth. I assure you, the battle is being carried out and we will restore prosperity and balance to America. As this battle is waged, every good candidate found will need the support of the nation to win. From coast to coast I call on the grassroots of America to take action and support these candidates by opting into their campaigns, donating what you can ($3 to $199), it really is the battle America must be engaged in. I urge you to watch these particular candidates over the next twelve months and see if I am not proven right:

Matt Bevin for U.S. Senate, Kentucky
Dan Bongino for U.S. Congress, Maryland -- Text BONGINO to 33733 to support him.
Bill Both for House District 22, Utah -- Text BOTH to 33733 to support him.
Craig Bowden for U.S. Congress, Utah -- Text BOWDEN to 33733 to support him.
Bill Connor for U.S. Senate, South Carolina
John Stevens for House District 57, Utah -- Text STEVENS to 33733 to support him.
Rob Maness for U.S. Senate, Louisiana
Ben Sasse  for U.S. Senate, Nebraska
Ryan Zinke for U.S. Congress, Montana
Tim Donnelly for Governor, California

As the months go on, I will add more candidates I think bear watching and supporting to the "Candidates to Watch" in the blog sidebar. So visit often as they are added. Read this quote as often as needed to keep your spirits up, and share this MEME far and wide.




Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.


Friday, November 1, 2013

PSBtxt forms a partnership with StatesmenPAC

PSBtxt and StatesmenPAC have formed a partnership to find 200 statesmen across America with PSBtxt providing the tools bringing their campaigns into the 21st Century. We invite you to join the fight against the political status quo by texting PSBTXT to 33733 and joining StatesmenPAC by texting JOHNADAMS to 33733. It’s time to restore the Republic.


Please share at will across all social media, it is time to crush the political status quo.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Monday, October 28, 2013

Yes America, We Were Lied to About Benghazi

Shockingly, CBS News has finally stepped up and told the truth about, as much as they could find, what happened in Benghazi.

60 Minutes: Yes, America, We were lied to about Benghazi
by John Hayward on Townhall.com

“60 Minutes” ran a report on the Benghazi scandal Sunday night that confirmed its status as an enduring scandal with many questions still remaining to be answered. Good thing the media was willing to cover for Barack Obama until he got re-elected, because this is some really damning stuff. The video is about 15 minutes long, and well worth watching in full:


For mainstream media news consumers, a lot of this will come as a total shock. (CBS News, it should be noted, has been far more aggressive in pursuing the Benghazi story than its competitors; they say Sunday night’s report was a year in the making.) Yes, America, you were lied to, early and often, by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and their crew. They knew damn well it was a terrorist attack from the beginning. They knew it was never a protest over a provocative YouTube video. They looked right into the faces of the families who lost sons, brothers, and husbands in Benghazi and lied to them.

The important point to take away from this exhaustive report is that the Administration knew it was a terrorist attack before it happened. Security officials in Libya knew al-Qaeda was going to launch an attack… because they said so. They boasted online of plans to attack the Red Cross, the British, and the Americans. ”They made good on two out of the three promises,” said Lt. Colonel Andy Wood, who was based in Tripoli and met routinely with Ambassador Christopher Stevens, and was at his post when terrorist forces tried to assassinate the British ambassador. ”It was a matter of time until they captured the third one.”

Wood said his warnings were ignored in Washington, even when he stated his belief that al-Qaeda was in the final planning stages for the attack, and it became known that a senior al-Qaeda leader, Abu Anas al-Libi, had been dispatched to Libya to set up a terror network.

As he said in Congressional testimony, deputy ambassador Greg Hicks wondered by his requests for help during the attack were ignored. The Administration’s response has been to claim that no assets were in place to respond to that call for assistance. That hardly lets the Obama team off the hook. On the contrary, it’s more baffling and outrageous than ever that no contingency rescue plans were made. The security situation in Benghazi was shockingly inappropriate for the threat level. Wood said the Administration wouldn’t even take the simple step of relocating the consulate after its situation began deteriorating in the weeks before the attack.

Another new revelation in the “60 Minutes” report is the testimony of a former British soldier who uses the pseudonym “Morgan Jones.” He was in charge of training the unarmed – yes, unarmed - security guards at the consulate. He didn’t have anything to do with the armed militia hired by the State Department to respond to an attack, but they scared him to death. ”These guys are no good. You need to get ‘em out of here,” he told State, warning that they wouldn’t stand and fight if they came under fire. ”In the end I got quite bored of hearing my own voice say it.”

Sadly, Jones was right – the militia broke and ran, leaving the unarmed men he had trained to call for help that never would have come, if the Obama Administration had gotten its way. But as we all know, someone did come: the brave men from the CIA annex. Lara Logan of CBS News recalled how they “ignored orders to wait and raced to the compound, at times running and shooting their way through the streets just to get there. Inside the compound, they repelled a force of as many as sixty armed terrorists, and managed to save five American lives and recover the body of Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith. They were forced to fight their way out before they could find the ambassador.”

Jones infiltrated an al-Qaeda-controlled hospital on the night of the attack to get eyes on the body of his slain friend, Ambassador Chris Stevens. He also got into the compound that was under siege – taking down an al-Qaeda fighter who spotted him, with a quick application of his rifle butt to the terrorist’s face – and witnessed the mortar strike that killed former SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Jones compared scoring three mortar hits on the roof of that building, in the dark, to “getting the basketball through the hoop over your shoulder,” identifying such precision as a result of “coordination, planning, training, experienced personnel… They knew what they were doing. That was a well-executed attack.”

That, of course, is not what Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the rest of their dishonest team told us. No one has yet been held accountable for what happened in Benghazi, and if Obama has his way, no one ever will be. No one who watches this CBS News report would trust Hillary Clinton to handle security for a Little League game. Perhaps the end of her presidential aspirations will be the closest anyone gets to answering for the blindness and dereliction of duty that got Ambassador Stevens, Woods, Doherty, and foreign service officer Sean Smith killed in Benghazi.

Morgan Jones said Smith expressed concerns about the security situation a week before the attack. Jones decided to keep his own fears to himself during that conversation. ”I didn’t want to worry him anymore, you know?” he told Lara Logan. ”He’s a nice guy. I sort of promised him he’d be OK.” He said he thinks about that promise “every day.” That’s a lot more thought than anyone in the Obama Administration evidently gave to Benghazi, beyond making plans to minimize the political damage and squeak through the 2012 election.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Jon Stewart Destroys Healthcare.gov aka Obamacare

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

 

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Ted Cruz Receives 8-Minute Standing Ovation Upon Returning Home

Ironically, the man the Democrats and moderate Republicans have vilified, received an 8-minute standing ovation upon his return to Texas. They are madly clinging to the power structure that Mike Lee and Ted Cruz are threatening at the behest of the American people.

So it must be heaven to get out of Washington, D.C. and get back to America, which is precisely what Ted Cruz said to his cheering supporters.

Originally published on The Daily Caller
by Patrick Howley

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz received an eight-minute standing ovation upon his return to Texas this past weekend, despite an extended, hostile campaign from Democrats and the mainstream media to portray him as a dangerous extremist.

“After two months in Washington, it’s great to be back in America,” Cruz said Saturday to approximately 750 people at an appearance in a San Antonio hotel ballroom, enjoying an eight-minute standing ovation for his dogged efforts to defund or delay Obamacare in the recent continuing-resolution budget fight.

Cruz also criticized members of his own Senate caucus for ”failing to stand with House Republicans against the train wreck that is Obamacare.”

The establishment media consistently criticized Cruz for supposedly violating Senate procedure and inflaming tensions with his more than 21-hour floor speech in favor of defunding Obamacare, despite the fact that most journalists have never done anything for 21 consecutive hours in their entire lives, according to reluctant Daily Caller interactions with respectable and educated Washington reporters.

Though the American press has devolved from its Joseph Pulitzer-dominated populist model to its dispiriting current incarnation, in which journalists feel it is their obligation to stand up for parliamentary procedure against rabble-rousing political stars trying to do interesting things for a change, the people of red-state America remain unswayed by anti-Cruz attacks.

Cruz registered a 74 percent favorability rating against an 8 percent unfavorability rating among Tea Party Republicans, and a 56 percent favorability rating among non-Tea Party Republicans, according to a Pew Research Center poll released last week. These numbers inspired The Daily Beast to declare that “The Ted Cruz Armageddon is Coming.”

While Armageddon is slated to last until all those who oppose Jehovah are cleansed from the Earth, it is unclear if God and the Four Horsemen will be able to make it past 21 hours.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Book Review: Red Shirt Kids


Originally published on US Daily Review on 13 October 2013
by Candace E. Salima, Senior Contributor

"Exciting, well-written and a page-turning mystery that will leave you breathless." Candace Salima

Authors: Bryce Clark and Kim Clark

It's not often you end up reviewing a "first novel" written by a television writer and the president of a university, but here I am reviewing Red Shirt Kids by two such men. I'll state right off the bat, I'm not certain tweens and younger should be reading this book. In fact, I'm going to recommend no one under thirteen read Red Shirt Kids without their parents having read it first. That being said, this is an extremely well-written, exciting book.

We open with the kidnapping of a brother and sister from a small town by an extremely creepy, apparently magical, guy. Fast forward to a new family moving into a home that suddenly, mysteriously, went on the market, and another brother and sister finding themselves in possession of some pretty amazing red shirts.

That's all I'm going to say about the story, I don't want to give anything important away. Just let me say, once you pick the book up you won't put it down.

The backliner reads:
Mike and Amy Smith are nervous about moving from their nice house in Boston to a dilapidated old mansion in Falton, New Hampshire. They know they'll have to start junior high school not knowing anyone, and their new house is just plain creepy.

While searching their dusty attic, Mike and Amy uncover an old wooden chest with a mysterious lock, inside they find magical red shirts that give them special powers. Together, with a new friend, Sam; Mike and Amy must figure out how to harness their newfound gifts while keeping them a secret from their parents. As their powers grow, they begin a search for two missing kids--pitting them against a powerful adversary with mystical powers of his own. Will Mike and Amy be able to unlock the ancient mystery of the shirts? And will they be able to find the missing children before it's too late?
The writing is crisp without being overbearing. The dialogue is sharp, and the characterization is well-done. The overall arc of the story trips right along without being bogged down in any section. It was a very easy read, which is always good.

The authors, Bryce and Kim Clark, are a son/father combination, with Bryce taking the stories his father told him growing up and turning them into a book and television series. Kim is the president of Brigham Young University Idaho, my alma mater (when it was still called Ricks Junior College); and the Red Shirt Kids stories were created originally as bedtime stories for Bryce and his siblings by Kim. I can see this book being the first of many that could emerge into a fabulous series. Without question, this could make an amazing television series on either the Disney Channel or Nickelodeon. I'll be making room on library shelves for a series of books by the Clarks.

This is a book that will intrigue and delight all, from teenagers to those of us who are much older. In fact, the book was so good I'll be reading it again! Red Shirt Kids receives a 4 out of 5 stars.

Age Range: 8 - 12 years
Hardcover: 192 pages
Publisher: Sourced Media Books (August 1, 2013)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1937458571
ISBN-13: 978-1937458577
Product Dimensions: 8.6 x 5.7 x 1 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds
Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #447,596 in Books


Candace E. Salima is an author, columnist, public speaker and political activist. A frequent radio guest on shows around the nation, she is valued for her viewpoint on a variety of subjects, particularly politics. Follow Candace on Facebook, Twitter or Google+. Learn more about her at www.candacesalima.com.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Friday, October 11, 2013

Senator Mike Lee's Speech at Value Voter's Summit

Thank you very much. It’s a privilege to be with you this morning at the Values Voter Summit.

I want to start this morning by telling you a story that I first heard from a man named Emo Phillips. He was walking across a bridge. It was late enough there was no automobile traffic on that bridge. In fact, there was no one on the bridge at all. So he was able to walk in the middle of the bridge. It was a high bridge. A bridge that stretched over a large river. It was high enough that anyone who fell off of that bridge would not survive the impact, even if they landed in the water.

He saw a man standing on the outside of the guardrail as if getting ready to jump. He knew based on the height of the bridge the man wouldn't survive the fall and he surmised the man was contemplating ending his life. Determined not to allow this to happen, Emo stopped and engaged the man in conversation.

He asked first if the man were a believer, if he believed in God. The man said, yes. Emo said, me too. He said, are you a Christian? The man said, yes. Emo said, me too. He asked the man if he were a Baptist. The man said yes. Emo said, me too.

“Are you a northern Baptist or southern?” “I'm a northern Baptist.” “Me too!”

“Are you a northern fundamentalist Baptist or reformed Baptist?” “I'm a northern fundamentalist Baptist.” “Me too!”

“Are you a northern fundamental Baptist of conference 1812 or 1857?”

He said, “northern fundamental Baptist of conference 1857.”

And I said “Die heretic!,” and pushed him off the bridge!

As values voters we must remember that it is far more important to keep our eyes on potential conservative converts – rather than heretics. You see, the principles that unite us are also the principles that position us to win the hearts and minds of voters across the country.

Too often in this town we stop thinking about the things that matter most. We get so caught up in the thick of things that we not only stop thinking big – we often stop thinking at all – which leads to other things - like $17 trillion debt, widespread dysfunction, and much more.

To illustrate the point, I want to tell you a story about my boys. I've got twin boys, 18 years old, their names are James and John. These sons of thunder as I sometimes call them are good boys. They go to church, they read their scriptures, they are 4.0 students.

On this particular day we were listening to the radio in my car. We were listening to a song on the radio, a song we had heard many times, a song that I hadn't listened to very carefully in the past.

All of a sudden for one particular reason or another, I started listening to the words this day. And I realized that these words were not necessarily good. They were not the words that any god-fearing father of teenage boys would want his kids hearing. All of a sudden I pointed out to them, this is a raunchy song, this is terrible. My son John without batting an eye said, “Dad, it's not bad if you don't think about it.” All of a sudden the horrific thought occurred to me, my son John must be advising the President of the United States!

You see, a $17 trillion debt isn't bad, but only if you don't think about it. Adding to that debt at a rate of a trillion dollars a year isn't bad, if you don't think about it. And a massive government takeover of our health care system isn't bad if you don't think about it.

If you do think about it, of course, all those things are horrible. If you do think about it, the very best argument against Obamacare is the president's conduct during the first ten days of this shutdown. I mean, look what's happened. The president is using the immense power of the federal government to hurt the American people. Why? In order to win a political argument. What happens then when we turn over some of the most private, intimate decisions in our lives, our health care system, to the government? When will that be used as a tool against us? We must stop it it, we must defund it, we cannot accept it.

You are here today because you ARE thinking about it.

The Republican Party is at its best when we are thinking about it. Unfortunately some people succumb to the notion that we can’t think deeply in the middle of big battles on heated issues. I say this is exactly what we should be doing – TODAY! And every day. Because when we stop and think we come back home to being the party of big ideas. Throughout our party’s history, the bigger our ideas, the more we have succeeded.

Ronald Reagan’s conservative revolution. The 1994 Contract with America. George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism.”

Whatever you might think of each of the above, they all showed in their time that it is ideas and principles – rather than personalities or interest groups - that unify the Republican Party and propel it to both electoral and governing success.

Lately we haven’t had much of either.

Some say it’s because we need better candidates. Some say we need a better message. Others say it’s a dispute about tactics and strategy, or technology.

And certainly they all play a part.

But to my mind, what the Party of Ideas is really missing… is the ideas. For too long, Republicans have put off the difficult work of developing a modernized, principled conservative reform agenda to meet many of the new challenges of the 21st century.

There are many reasons why this is so. But I think the biggest is that in this city, conservatives often fall into a trap – defining ourselves by what we are against

Big government… debt… higher taxes and regulations… oh and I almost forgot - Obamacare.

But we haven’t invested nearly as much time and energy in communicating what we conservatives are for.

I’m talking about more than simply the policies we advocate. Conservatism is not about the bills we want to pass, but the nation we want to be. As you know, for conservatives, politics is just a means, not an end. The real goal - what conservatives are really for - is not an agenda for government. It’s a vision of society. A view of the world we want to build, together.

Together. That word, “together,” is an essential – and too often overlooked – part of what we conservatives believe.

We’re all committed to bedrock principles of individual liberty, individual rights, and personal responsibility.

But the reason we fight for individual freedom is the strength, vitality, and value of the communities free individuals form.

The alternative to big government is not small government.

The alternative to big government is a thriving, flourishing nation of cooperative communities – where your success depends on your service.

It’s a free enterprise economy where everyone works for everyone else, competing to see who can figure out the best way to help the most people.

And it’s a voluntary civil society, where free individuals come together to meet each other’s needs, fill in the gaps, and make sure no one gets left behind.

Conservatism has never been a vision of isolated loners.

Ours is a vision of husbands and wives; parents and children; neighbors and neighborhoods; volunteers and congregations; bosses and employees; businesses and customers; clubs, teams, groups, associations and friends.

We conservatives don’t simply want smaller government – that’s not enough. We want bigger citizens, stronger neighborhoods, and more heroic communities.

We understand what liberals do not. That in America, freedom doesn’t mean “you’re on your own.” Freedom means “we’re all in this together.”

The value we place on communityis based on the value we place on the first and most important human community of them all: the family. Conservatives have argued for years that the family must be at the core of our worldview.

On issues like school prayer, or the right to life, or traditional marriage, or home-schooling, conservatives have said protecting the family is the most important part of our moral agenda.

Today, some critics say that times have changed… and we have to change with them. They say we have to reach out to people beyond our conservative base. They say we have to change the way we think and talk about families. It may surprise some of you to hear… but I think they make a great point.

Times have changed. We do need to broaden our appeal, and change the way we think and talk about family.

But ultimately, the critics have it backwards. The problem is not that conservatives have focused too muchon the family -- but far too little. For the rapid changes we have seen in recent years in America have only made the family more important, not less.

The family is the foundation not only of our society, but of our economy, our culture, and our democracy as well.

The family is indivisible from any facet of America’s history or destiny.

Crises like divorce, fatherlessness, and social isolation – while moral in nature – have enormous social and economic consequences.

In the same way, economic problems like unequal opportunity; stagnant wages; and the spiraling costs of housing, health care, and education represent moral threats to family stability… and national success.

Working families today are bearing the brunt of all of the above. And as a result, too many are falling behind.

Abraham Lincoln explained that the role of government should be for every citizen at every stage of life:
“…to lift artificial weights from all shoulders, to clear the paths of laudable pursuit for all, to afford all an unfettered start and a fair chance in the race of life.”
Lincoln’s insight offers an almost perfect distillation of what America - and the Republican Party, at its best - stand for: equal opportunity, for all, to pursue happiness.

Today, this fundamental American ideal is hanging by a thread.

Up and down American society – which used to be defined and driven by what Tocqueville called our “yearning desire to rise” - we find a new and unnatural stagnancy.

We find the underprivileged trapped in poverty, sometimes for generations.

We find the middle class caught on a treadmill, running harder every year just to maintain the economic security and social cohesion that were once taken for granted.

Meanwhile, at the top of our society, we find a political and economic elite that – having reached the highest rungs – has pulled up the ladder behind itself, denying others the chance even to climb.

From Wall Street to K Street to Pennsylvania Avenue, we find special interests increasingly exempted and insulated – by law - from the rigors of competition and the consequences of their own mistakes.

All of this points to what really is an inequality crisis in America today – a crisis not of unequal wealth or income… but unequal opportunity.

Progressives, from the president on down, say that inequality in America today is a failure of the free market… resulting from insufficient government intervention.

But if you look closely, you start to notice… the opposite is true.

Today, many of Lincoln’s “artificial weights” and obstacles blocking his “paths of laudable pursuit” are themselves dysfunctional government policies.

It is government policies, after all, that trap poor children in rotten schools; poor families in broken neighborhoods; that penalize single parents for getting raises, or getting married.

It is government policies that inflate costs and limit access to quality schools and health care; that hamstring badly needed innovation in higher education; and penalize parents’ investment in their children.

This opportunity crisis is absolutely real – sadly it is just as real as the liberals’ flawed, seductive, big-government proposals to create their version of opportunity.

It is not enough for us simply to oppose liberals’ ideas. We have to propose conservative ones.

True victory for values voters may be found a little ways down on that road less traveled, but it’s long past time for conservatives to take it. Our movement is at its best when we take on big challenges.

And the great challenge of our time is the challenge of the forgotten family: the honest, noble parents across the country trying to make ends meet in a society, economy, and democracy increasingly rigged by Washington against them and their children.

It is time for a new conservative reform agenda that levels the playing field and finally meets the challenges facing working families:
  • to give underprivileged families a fair chance to work their way into the middle class;
  • to give families struggling to stay in middle class their fair chance to make a good living and build a good life;
  • to make it easier for couples for start families… for entrepreneurs to start businesses… and volunteers to start civic and charitable organizations;
  • to help all Americans at every step along the path to success overcome the obstacles big government has put before them.
It is time for a new approach to taxes, to not only lower rates to spur economic opportunity, but to eliminate tax discrimination against parents and families. I am working on a bill designed to do just that.

It is time for a new approach to education, to break up the special-interest cartels that hold back our young children, and our young adults. Education is opportunity, and government has no business telling students where they can and can’t go to get it.

It is time for a new approach to transportation. New roads mean new neighborhoods, new communities, new jobs, new families, and new opportunities.

Yet today, infrastructure money states could be spending on those opportunities, Washington instead spends on bureaucratic waste and special-interest giveaways.

It is time to rethink a dysfunctional welfare system that holds poor families down. And to reform a corrupt corporate welfare system that props big businesses up.

We need to find new ways – conservative ways that rely on free enterprise and civil society -- to help young couples:
  • get married,
  • afford a home,
  • raise and educate their kids,
  • get good health care,
  • take care of their elderly parents,
  • and retire with security themselves.
Our movement has always identified with those Americans who through hard work and determination have climbed the ladder of success. And we always should.

But our ideals demand we identify even more with those Americans still on the bottom rungs, where the climbing is harder, dangerous, and lonely.

We need to stand up for those Americans no one else will:
  • for the unborn child in the womb;
  • for the poor student caught in the failing school;
  • for the reformed father languishing in prison and the fatherless son facing alone the dangers of the street;
  • for the single mom working two jobs but still ensnared in big-government poverty traps;
  • for the elderly and the disabled, dehumanized by bureaucracy;
  • and for the splintering neighborhoods that desperately need them all.

These families, these moms and dads and grandparents and kids: they’re waiting for us.

They know more government isn’t the answer. They know government only divides them.

But they also know that too often… our party has ignored them.

That has to change.

And it has to change today… right now… because every hour, every day, big government leaves more and more American families behind.

It is time for conservatives to remember those forgotten families. In word and deed, in our hearts and in our agenda.

It is time to remember that the most audacious entrepreneurs in America are not high-tech CEOs in Silicon Valley… they’re a young couple at a church back home, saying “I do.”

It is time to remember that the most important investments in our nation’s future are not issued on Wall Street… but are sleeping in their mothers’ arms at the maternity unit of your local hospital.

To be truly pro-growth and pro-opportunity, our agenda must be truly pro-family.

Not just on some issues, but all of them.

I believe if conservatives look anew at the challenges facing the family, we will quickly discover opportunities to meet - united and undaunted - the challenges facing our movement… our economy… and our nation.

Building a new conservative agenda of reform around these moms and dads and kids – remembering America’s values and especially America’s forgotten families – is the path to restoring the greatness of our nation.

And if – at long last – conservatives finally take that road less traveled, it will make all the difference.

Thank you for everything you do. Keep the faith. And may God bless you all. (Source)


Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Lee Discusses Problems With Public Lands Highlighted By Shutdown

"Over the past week or so, it has become apparent that certain federal agencies have, in a number of instances, acted rather intentionally to cause what I would consider undue hardship for the purpose of making a political point…

"Another aspect of this problem is that there are some states that are by their very nature far more susceptible to this kind of manipulation and this kind of intentional infliction of pain than other states. While most states have within them less than 10 percent of federal land, meaning that while in most states less than 10 percent of the land is owned by the federal government, in 11 Western states, including my own, the government owns more than 50 percent of the land. In my state—the state of Utah—the federal government owns roughly 70 percent of the land. And while some may praise the benefits of public land, it’s clear that the federal government can and will use its immense power as a political tool. And I would add to this—public land becomes very unlike public land when it is closed by people who arbitrarily say “because of a shutdown we’re going to exclude you.” It becomes government land at that point, and that’s the point they seem to be making…"

"The bottom line here is that federal land management agencies exert enormous amounts of influence over the country, an influence that’s not often recognized by those outside the Western United States. This influence is not just in the national parks, it’s felt in many aspects of every day life in states like mine. It’s felt in how we fund public schools, how we maintain our police and our fire services, and how we develop our infrastructure. And as we’ve seen over the past week, these agencies are willing and able to wheeled tremendous influence in a manner that serves the political ambitions of the few, at the expense of the many. This raises a number of questions about the nature and extent of federally owned land, questions we need to address here in congress."

###

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Friday, September 27, 2013

EW Jackson running for LG of Virginia

A truly astounding speech from EW Jackson who is a candidate for Lieutenant Governor in Virginia. This speech spoke so deeply to my heart, wow! Contact his campaign today to see if they will let me help with PSBtxt's tools that empower campaigns and candidates.



Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

In Light of the Washington Navy Yard Shooting

by Daniel Bongino, Former Secret Service
U.S. Congressional Candidate for Maryland's 6th District
Text BONGINO to 33733 to Opt In

In light of recent events I am posting today as a former Secret Service agent, not a candidate. This is not the time for politics.

An active shooter kills someone, on average, every 15 seconds. Tragically, in these types of incidents the killer is not looking to negotiate, he is looking to inflict maximum carnage.

Heaven forbid you are involved in one of these scenarios, keep these points in mind. First, if an immediate exit point is available take it, but if it is a distance away then take the opportunity to lock a door, barricade it and find a place to conceal yourself. Second, avoid being caught in hallways and doorways. Hallways serve as "fatal-funnels" and fired rounds can ricochet off the walls. Doorways can silhouette your profile making you an easy target. Third, understand that if confronted you will have to fight back. These types of murderers have no interest in anything but death. Find an object and use it as a weapon, it may save your life.

It's sad that we have to have these conversations but in a world where your God-given right to self-protection is treated as a tradable commodity, I feel an obligation to give you options while others choose to take them away.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

The Second City Network Mocks Obama...What?

Liberals mocking Obama? Stunning turn of events in America. Apparently Obama is apparently no longer sacrosanct and open to scrutiny and mocking. I was beginning to think that the deliberate ignorance and cover-up was going to continue throughout this ridiculous presidency we are being subjected to. Enjoy!



Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Monday, September 16, 2013

For The Love of All That is Good in the World!





Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Sunday, September 15, 2013

How Important is Religious Freedom?

The 11th Article of Faith from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints states:
11  We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.
I would add, that freedom to worship according to the dictates of our own conscience would also include that which does infringe on the religious liberty of another.



Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Dan Bongino, Maryland's 6th Congressional District

Daniel Bongino is running for Congress in Maryland's 6th District. On September 11th, he spoke on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol at the Patriots4America and Special Operations Speaks event remembering the Benghazi 4. I can only say, he speaks the words that I have often spoken. Maryland, this is your man.




Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Rion Page - X-Factor

It is not too often in life when grace, beauty and talent are trumped by sheer, unadulterated perseverance. Rion Page is truly an amazing little girl.


Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Soft Tyranny in America



Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Senator Mike Lee Opposes Intervention in Syrian Civil War

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, September 5, 2013

Lee Opposes Intervention in Syrian Civil War

“The real threat to U.S. credibility is not what happens if we don’t intervene, but what happens if we do without a plan for what comes next.”

WASHINGTON – Today, Senator Mike Lee released the following statement in opposition to U.S. military action in Syria:

“The administration has indicated its goal is to use limited military action to significantly degrade Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s ability to use chemical weapons against his own people and to deter future attacks. After hearing from the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in a top-secret briefing, I do not believe that the range of options the president is considering will accomplish this military objective, and therefore I cannot now support intervention into the Syrian civil war.

“First, it remains unclear how the president’s plan to execute limited strikes would prevent Assad from using chemical weapons again or even make it less likely. Second, it is entirely possible that ineffective U.S. strikes would embolden Assad to become even more ruthless towards his people.

“Finally, I am greatly concerned that in order to achieve the president’s goal, the U.S. would be required to become much more deeply involved in the Syrian civil war than the administration is willing to commit. The real threat to U.S. credibility is not what happens if we don’t intervene, but what happens if we do without a plan for what comes next.

“The risks of the president’s strategy far outweigh the possible gains. We cannot ask our men and women in uniform to engage in a military conflict that does not present a national security threat to the United States. Instead, the U. S. should work vigorously to identify and neutralize any real threats to our national security – such as the proliferation of chemical weapons. We must work to ensure that chemical weapons in Syria do not get into the hands of groups that will use them against American or western targets.”

# # #

This post is sponsored by PSBtxt:



Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

BYU Wins in Historic Fashion

by Candace Salima

Last night, the Brigham Young University Cougars saw a repeat of the week before, but this "delay of game" due to rain was much more serious than in Virginia. My phone was getting blown up with text messages from the National Weather Service and local news services. It looked like heaven decided to just open up the dams and let it pour. Sheets of rain were pouring down our window, the tree out front swinging wildly in the wind. And this is how the BYU football stadium looked during the game delay.

LaVell Edwards Stadium, Brigham Young University, 4:00pm MDT on 7 September 2013
Facebook was exploding with pictures of flooded homes, streets and this was the University Mall parking lot. People were out sandbagging the streets, bailing out the flooded basements of homes across the valley, and all the while, the people of Utah Valley were anxiously waiting for the game to start.

In our neighborhood, the wind was mighty and the rain torrential, but we had no flooding. And, if you go to the BYU Football Facebook Page, you'll see some stunning pictures.

Through all this, Bronco Mendenhall and Robert Anae managed to keep the team warm, loosened up and ready to play. And wow, when they came out, they came out to rule the field. There would be no repeat of last week's game against the University of Virginia.

Taysom Hill had a difficult first half. One incompleted pass after another, and it seemed as if BYU's defense was going to spend most of the time on the field. But that changed, and it did so toward the end of the first half.

First, Eathyn Manumaleuna and Kyle Van Noy ruled the field, with the BYU secondary owning it as well. They kept the #15 ranked team in the nation, the Texas Longhorns, to a measly 21 points while BYU's offense smashed the school's rushing record. Between Taysom Hill who is the quarterback, Jamal Williams and others, they racked up 550 unprecedented rushing yards against the Longhorns. Taysom Hill, alone, rushed for 259 yards, 3 rushing touchdowns, and just for kicks and giggles, he passed for 129 yards. (He needs to pick up the passing yardage.)

Play after play was delivered with clean precision, and the BYU football team marched relentlessly down the field, time and time again. If the Offense fumbled, the Defense took it right back. And the Defense rarely, if ever, had a misstep. It was a fun night for Cougar Fans all the way around. However...

In particular, I noticed an incident at the end of a Jamal Williams run and first down. In the pile, I saw a Longhorn football player take Jamal's shoulders and pull him backward into an almost 90 degree angle position. He could have broken Jamal's back and most certainly injure him greatly. As it was, Jamal stumbled off the field and nearly fell to his knees as he crossed the sideline. This was uncalled for and the NCAA should be issuing a fine to the player and the University of Texas Longhorns. This was above and beyond the rough and tumble of football, and edging into criminal assault.

All that aside, BYU took down the #15 ranked team in the nation in glorious fashion, spanked 'em and sent them home. Congratulations, to our BYU Cougars! I hope they bring this same A-game to the BYU/UofU game next week. 

BYU 40 - Texas 21


Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

What is democracy? - The greater Good - The Greater Greed.

Guest Blogger: Cash Case

Dallas, Texas 

People are often very surprised to learn that we do not live in a democracy. We have been taught by uninformed teachers our whole lives that we do indeed live in a democracy. In actuality, we live in a republic.

Here’s the difference. In a democracy, the majority rules...seems fair enough, until you dig down into the thing just a bit. Majority rule works for somethings, sometimes. An example would be the elections we have been having for the last 236+ years. But it does not work for all things, and where the rights of the individual are concerned, it never works. Where the individual is concerned majority rule is a disaster.

Let’s look at an analogy.

A man purchases a piece of land in the middle of nowhere. He has the rightful ownership of this land. He builds a farm, marries and has children. He works the land and builds it into a nice farm that provides for him, his family and even has extra that he can store for when the weather doesn’t cooperate. His children grow and are now young men and they help their parents with the farm. He has put more than two decades into the land. Preparing the soil, building the farm management infrastructure and securing for himself and his family, a living.

Now someone, say a land developer comes by and sees what the framer has done and decides to purchase land near the farmer’s. This person then sells and builds homes on his land. Perfectly normal and fair.

The homes are purchased and a small town begins to grow. The people in the town organize themselves and create their own town council/city government. Again… perfectly normal.

Now a few years go by and the town has grown and the people in the town have voted themselves new taxes to pay for whatever they deem necessary. Everything is still good.

Now, at this point, the town is land locked. They need growth to increase the tax base to pay for the new shopping center that the town can’t live without. The city council looks around and says…”Hey that farmer guy has some great land. Let’s ask him to sell us his land. They do, the farmer declines, and now they have a problem.

The people want this shopping center, but the farmer wants his farm. It is his. He built it with his own sweat and blood to provide for his family and he has every right to it. The city council decides they are going to take his land for ‘the greater good’. They force the farmer from his land, and build their shopping center.

That’s democracy!

Nobody did anything wrong until the majority looked at the minority and said…”We want that.”

Some of you may read this and say, “What’s wrong with that?” They paid the farmer fair market value.”

Can they give the farmer back his 40 years? Can they give him back the ‘industry’ he created for his family? In a word, no.

Our founding fathers created a republic for this very reason, to protect the individual from the majority. They knew that a government would grow endlessly unless they did something to restrict it. That is what the constitution does for us. That’s its whole purpose, to protect the individual and by extension, the people from the governing body.

The rights of the individual are paramount to the continuation of the American way of life.

Ben Franklin said, “a democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.”

Without a republic, there is no liberty. Without liberty there is only tyranny.


Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.