Monday, October 28, 2013

Yes America, We Were Lied to About Benghazi

Shockingly, CBS News has finally stepped up and told the truth about, as much as they could find, what happened in Benghazi.

60 Minutes: Yes, America, We were lied to about Benghazi
by John Hayward on Townhall.com

“60 Minutes” ran a report on the Benghazi scandal Sunday night that confirmed its status as an enduring scandal with many questions still remaining to be answered. Good thing the media was willing to cover for Barack Obama until he got re-elected, because this is some really damning stuff. The video is about 15 minutes long, and well worth watching in full:


For mainstream media news consumers, a lot of this will come as a total shock. (CBS News, it should be noted, has been far more aggressive in pursuing the Benghazi story than its competitors; they say Sunday night’s report was a year in the making.) Yes, America, you were lied to, early and often, by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and their crew. They knew damn well it was a terrorist attack from the beginning. They knew it was never a protest over a provocative YouTube video. They looked right into the faces of the families who lost sons, brothers, and husbands in Benghazi and lied to them.

The important point to take away from this exhaustive report is that the Administration knew it was a terrorist attack before it happened. Security officials in Libya knew al-Qaeda was going to launch an attack… because they said so. They boasted online of plans to attack the Red Cross, the British, and the Americans. ”They made good on two out of the three promises,” said Lt. Colonel Andy Wood, who was based in Tripoli and met routinely with Ambassador Christopher Stevens, and was at his post when terrorist forces tried to assassinate the British ambassador. ”It was a matter of time until they captured the third one.”

Wood said his warnings were ignored in Washington, even when he stated his belief that al-Qaeda was in the final planning stages for the attack, and it became known that a senior al-Qaeda leader, Abu Anas al-Libi, had been dispatched to Libya to set up a terror network.

As he said in Congressional testimony, deputy ambassador Greg Hicks wondered by his requests for help during the attack were ignored. The Administration’s response has been to claim that no assets were in place to respond to that call for assistance. That hardly lets the Obama team off the hook. On the contrary, it’s more baffling and outrageous than ever that no contingency rescue plans were made. The security situation in Benghazi was shockingly inappropriate for the threat level. Wood said the Administration wouldn’t even take the simple step of relocating the consulate after its situation began deteriorating in the weeks before the attack.

Another new revelation in the “60 Minutes” report is the testimony of a former British soldier who uses the pseudonym “Morgan Jones.” He was in charge of training the unarmed – yes, unarmed - security guards at the consulate. He didn’t have anything to do with the armed militia hired by the State Department to respond to an attack, but they scared him to death. ”These guys are no good. You need to get ‘em out of here,” he told State, warning that they wouldn’t stand and fight if they came under fire. ”In the end I got quite bored of hearing my own voice say it.”

Sadly, Jones was right – the militia broke and ran, leaving the unarmed men he had trained to call for help that never would have come, if the Obama Administration had gotten its way. But as we all know, someone did come: the brave men from the CIA annex. Lara Logan of CBS News recalled how they “ignored orders to wait and raced to the compound, at times running and shooting their way through the streets just to get there. Inside the compound, they repelled a force of as many as sixty armed terrorists, and managed to save five American lives and recover the body of Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith. They were forced to fight their way out before they could find the ambassador.”

Jones infiltrated an al-Qaeda-controlled hospital on the night of the attack to get eyes on the body of his slain friend, Ambassador Chris Stevens. He also got into the compound that was under siege – taking down an al-Qaeda fighter who spotted him, with a quick application of his rifle butt to the terrorist’s face – and witnessed the mortar strike that killed former SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Jones compared scoring three mortar hits on the roof of that building, in the dark, to “getting the basketball through the hoop over your shoulder,” identifying such precision as a result of “coordination, planning, training, experienced personnel… They knew what they were doing. That was a well-executed attack.”

That, of course, is not what Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the rest of their dishonest team told us. No one has yet been held accountable for what happened in Benghazi, and if Obama has his way, no one ever will be. No one who watches this CBS News report would trust Hillary Clinton to handle security for a Little League game. Perhaps the end of her presidential aspirations will be the closest anyone gets to answering for the blindness and dereliction of duty that got Ambassador Stevens, Woods, Doherty, and foreign service officer Sean Smith killed in Benghazi.

Morgan Jones said Smith expressed concerns about the security situation a week before the attack. Jones decided to keep his own fears to himself during that conversation. ”I didn’t want to worry him anymore, you know?” he told Lara Logan. ”He’s a nice guy. I sort of promised him he’d be OK.” He said he thinks about that promise “every day.” That’s a lot more thought than anyone in the Obama Administration evidently gave to Benghazi, beyond making plans to minimize the political damage and squeak through the 2012 election.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Jon Stewart Destroys Healthcare.gov aka Obamacare

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

 

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Ted Cruz Receives 8-Minute Standing Ovation Upon Returning Home

Ironically, the man the Democrats and moderate Republicans have vilified, received an 8-minute standing ovation upon his return to Texas. They are madly clinging to the power structure that Mike Lee and Ted Cruz are threatening at the behest of the American people.

So it must be heaven to get out of Washington, D.C. and get back to America, which is precisely what Ted Cruz said to his cheering supporters.

Originally published on The Daily Caller
by Patrick Howley

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz received an eight-minute standing ovation upon his return to Texas this past weekend, despite an extended, hostile campaign from Democrats and the mainstream media to portray him as a dangerous extremist.

“After two months in Washington, it’s great to be back in America,” Cruz said Saturday to approximately 750 people at an appearance in a San Antonio hotel ballroom, enjoying an eight-minute standing ovation for his dogged efforts to defund or delay Obamacare in the recent continuing-resolution budget fight.

Cruz also criticized members of his own Senate caucus for ”failing to stand with House Republicans against the train wreck that is Obamacare.”

The establishment media consistently criticized Cruz for supposedly violating Senate procedure and inflaming tensions with his more than 21-hour floor speech in favor of defunding Obamacare, despite the fact that most journalists have never done anything for 21 consecutive hours in their entire lives, according to reluctant Daily Caller interactions with respectable and educated Washington reporters.

Though the American press has devolved from its Joseph Pulitzer-dominated populist model to its dispiriting current incarnation, in which journalists feel it is their obligation to stand up for parliamentary procedure against rabble-rousing political stars trying to do interesting things for a change, the people of red-state America remain unswayed by anti-Cruz attacks.

Cruz registered a 74 percent favorability rating against an 8 percent unfavorability rating among Tea Party Republicans, and a 56 percent favorability rating among non-Tea Party Republicans, according to a Pew Research Center poll released last week. These numbers inspired The Daily Beast to declare that “The Ted Cruz Armageddon is Coming.”

While Armageddon is slated to last until all those who oppose Jehovah are cleansed from the Earth, it is unclear if God and the Four Horsemen will be able to make it past 21 hours.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Book Review: Red Shirt Kids


Originally published on US Daily Review on 13 October 2013
by Candace E. Salima, Senior Contributor

"Exciting, well-written and a page-turning mystery that will leave you breathless." Candace Salima

Authors: Bryce Clark and Kim Clark

It's not often you end up reviewing a "first novel" written by a television writer and the president of a university, but here I am reviewing Red Shirt Kids by two such men. I'll state right off the bat, I'm not certain tweens and younger should be reading this book. In fact, I'm going to recommend no one under thirteen read Red Shirt Kids without their parents having read it first. That being said, this is an extremely well-written, exciting book.

We open with the kidnapping of a brother and sister from a small town by an extremely creepy, apparently magical, guy. Fast forward to a new family moving into a home that suddenly, mysteriously, went on the market, and another brother and sister finding themselves in possession of some pretty amazing red shirts.

That's all I'm going to say about the story, I don't want to give anything important away. Just let me say, once you pick the book up you won't put it down.

The backliner reads:
Mike and Amy Smith are nervous about moving from their nice house in Boston to a dilapidated old mansion in Falton, New Hampshire. They know they'll have to start junior high school not knowing anyone, and their new house is just plain creepy.

While searching their dusty attic, Mike and Amy uncover an old wooden chest with a mysterious lock, inside they find magical red shirts that give them special powers. Together, with a new friend, Sam; Mike and Amy must figure out how to harness their newfound gifts while keeping them a secret from their parents. As their powers grow, they begin a search for two missing kids--pitting them against a powerful adversary with mystical powers of his own. Will Mike and Amy be able to unlock the ancient mystery of the shirts? And will they be able to find the missing children before it's too late?
The writing is crisp without being overbearing. The dialogue is sharp, and the characterization is well-done. The overall arc of the story trips right along without being bogged down in any section. It was a very easy read, which is always good.

The authors, Bryce and Kim Clark, are a son/father combination, with Bryce taking the stories his father told him growing up and turning them into a book and television series. Kim is the president of Brigham Young University Idaho, my alma mater (when it was still called Ricks Junior College); and the Red Shirt Kids stories were created originally as bedtime stories for Bryce and his siblings by Kim. I can see this book being the first of many that could emerge into a fabulous series. Without question, this could make an amazing television series on either the Disney Channel or Nickelodeon. I'll be making room on library shelves for a series of books by the Clarks.

This is a book that will intrigue and delight all, from teenagers to those of us who are much older. In fact, the book was so good I'll be reading it again! Red Shirt Kids receives a 4 out of 5 stars.

Age Range: 8 - 12 years
Hardcover: 192 pages
Publisher: Sourced Media Books (August 1, 2013)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1937458571
ISBN-13: 978-1937458577
Product Dimensions: 8.6 x 5.7 x 1 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds
Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #447,596 in Books


Candace E. Salima is an author, columnist, public speaker and political activist. A frequent radio guest on shows around the nation, she is valued for her viewpoint on a variety of subjects, particularly politics. Follow Candace on Facebook, Twitter or Google+. Learn more about her at www.candacesalima.com.

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Friday, October 11, 2013

Senator Mike Lee's Speech at Value Voter's Summit

Thank you very much. It’s a privilege to be with you this morning at the Values Voter Summit.

I want to start this morning by telling you a story that I first heard from a man named Emo Phillips. He was walking across a bridge. It was late enough there was no automobile traffic on that bridge. In fact, there was no one on the bridge at all. So he was able to walk in the middle of the bridge. It was a high bridge. A bridge that stretched over a large river. It was high enough that anyone who fell off of that bridge would not survive the impact, even if they landed in the water.

He saw a man standing on the outside of the guardrail as if getting ready to jump. He knew based on the height of the bridge the man wouldn't survive the fall and he surmised the man was contemplating ending his life. Determined not to allow this to happen, Emo stopped and engaged the man in conversation.

He asked first if the man were a believer, if he believed in God. The man said, yes. Emo said, me too. He said, are you a Christian? The man said, yes. Emo said, me too. He asked the man if he were a Baptist. The man said yes. Emo said, me too.

“Are you a northern Baptist or southern?” “I'm a northern Baptist.” “Me too!”

“Are you a northern fundamentalist Baptist or reformed Baptist?” “I'm a northern fundamentalist Baptist.” “Me too!”

“Are you a northern fundamental Baptist of conference 1812 or 1857?”

He said, “northern fundamental Baptist of conference 1857.”

And I said “Die heretic!,” and pushed him off the bridge!

As values voters we must remember that it is far more important to keep our eyes on potential conservative converts – rather than heretics. You see, the principles that unite us are also the principles that position us to win the hearts and minds of voters across the country.

Too often in this town we stop thinking about the things that matter most. We get so caught up in the thick of things that we not only stop thinking big – we often stop thinking at all – which leads to other things - like $17 trillion debt, widespread dysfunction, and much more.

To illustrate the point, I want to tell you a story about my boys. I've got twin boys, 18 years old, their names are James and John. These sons of thunder as I sometimes call them are good boys. They go to church, they read their scriptures, they are 4.0 students.

On this particular day we were listening to the radio in my car. We were listening to a song on the radio, a song we had heard many times, a song that I hadn't listened to very carefully in the past.

All of a sudden for one particular reason or another, I started listening to the words this day. And I realized that these words were not necessarily good. They were not the words that any god-fearing father of teenage boys would want his kids hearing. All of a sudden I pointed out to them, this is a raunchy song, this is terrible. My son John without batting an eye said, “Dad, it's not bad if you don't think about it.” All of a sudden the horrific thought occurred to me, my son John must be advising the President of the United States!

You see, a $17 trillion debt isn't bad, but only if you don't think about it. Adding to that debt at a rate of a trillion dollars a year isn't bad, if you don't think about it. And a massive government takeover of our health care system isn't bad if you don't think about it.

If you do think about it, of course, all those things are horrible. If you do think about it, the very best argument against Obamacare is the president's conduct during the first ten days of this shutdown. I mean, look what's happened. The president is using the immense power of the federal government to hurt the American people. Why? In order to win a political argument. What happens then when we turn over some of the most private, intimate decisions in our lives, our health care system, to the government? When will that be used as a tool against us? We must stop it it, we must defund it, we cannot accept it.

You are here today because you ARE thinking about it.

The Republican Party is at its best when we are thinking about it. Unfortunately some people succumb to the notion that we can’t think deeply in the middle of big battles on heated issues. I say this is exactly what we should be doing – TODAY! And every day. Because when we stop and think we come back home to being the party of big ideas. Throughout our party’s history, the bigger our ideas, the more we have succeeded.

Ronald Reagan’s conservative revolution. The 1994 Contract with America. George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism.”

Whatever you might think of each of the above, they all showed in their time that it is ideas and principles – rather than personalities or interest groups - that unify the Republican Party and propel it to both electoral and governing success.

Lately we haven’t had much of either.

Some say it’s because we need better candidates. Some say we need a better message. Others say it’s a dispute about tactics and strategy, or technology.

And certainly they all play a part.

But to my mind, what the Party of Ideas is really missing… is the ideas. For too long, Republicans have put off the difficult work of developing a modernized, principled conservative reform agenda to meet many of the new challenges of the 21st century.

There are many reasons why this is so. But I think the biggest is that in this city, conservatives often fall into a trap – defining ourselves by what we are against

Big government… debt… higher taxes and regulations… oh and I almost forgot - Obamacare.

But we haven’t invested nearly as much time and energy in communicating what we conservatives are for.

I’m talking about more than simply the policies we advocate. Conservatism is not about the bills we want to pass, but the nation we want to be. As you know, for conservatives, politics is just a means, not an end. The real goal - what conservatives are really for - is not an agenda for government. It’s a vision of society. A view of the world we want to build, together.

Together. That word, “together,” is an essential – and too often overlooked – part of what we conservatives believe.

We’re all committed to bedrock principles of individual liberty, individual rights, and personal responsibility.

But the reason we fight for individual freedom is the strength, vitality, and value of the communities free individuals form.

The alternative to big government is not small government.

The alternative to big government is a thriving, flourishing nation of cooperative communities – where your success depends on your service.

It’s a free enterprise economy where everyone works for everyone else, competing to see who can figure out the best way to help the most people.

And it’s a voluntary civil society, where free individuals come together to meet each other’s needs, fill in the gaps, and make sure no one gets left behind.

Conservatism has never been a vision of isolated loners.

Ours is a vision of husbands and wives; parents and children; neighbors and neighborhoods; volunteers and congregations; bosses and employees; businesses and customers; clubs, teams, groups, associations and friends.

We conservatives don’t simply want smaller government – that’s not enough. We want bigger citizens, stronger neighborhoods, and more heroic communities.

We understand what liberals do not. That in America, freedom doesn’t mean “you’re on your own.” Freedom means “we’re all in this together.”

The value we place on communityis based on the value we place on the first and most important human community of them all: the family. Conservatives have argued for years that the family must be at the core of our worldview.

On issues like school prayer, or the right to life, or traditional marriage, or home-schooling, conservatives have said protecting the family is the most important part of our moral agenda.

Today, some critics say that times have changed… and we have to change with them. They say we have to reach out to people beyond our conservative base. They say we have to change the way we think and talk about families. It may surprise some of you to hear… but I think they make a great point.

Times have changed. We do need to broaden our appeal, and change the way we think and talk about family.

But ultimately, the critics have it backwards. The problem is not that conservatives have focused too muchon the family -- but far too little. For the rapid changes we have seen in recent years in America have only made the family more important, not less.

The family is the foundation not only of our society, but of our economy, our culture, and our democracy as well.

The family is indivisible from any facet of America’s history or destiny.

Crises like divorce, fatherlessness, and social isolation – while moral in nature – have enormous social and economic consequences.

In the same way, economic problems like unequal opportunity; stagnant wages; and the spiraling costs of housing, health care, and education represent moral threats to family stability… and national success.

Working families today are bearing the brunt of all of the above. And as a result, too many are falling behind.

Abraham Lincoln explained that the role of government should be for every citizen at every stage of life:
“…to lift artificial weights from all shoulders, to clear the paths of laudable pursuit for all, to afford all an unfettered start and a fair chance in the race of life.”
Lincoln’s insight offers an almost perfect distillation of what America - and the Republican Party, at its best - stand for: equal opportunity, for all, to pursue happiness.

Today, this fundamental American ideal is hanging by a thread.

Up and down American society – which used to be defined and driven by what Tocqueville called our “yearning desire to rise” - we find a new and unnatural stagnancy.

We find the underprivileged trapped in poverty, sometimes for generations.

We find the middle class caught on a treadmill, running harder every year just to maintain the economic security and social cohesion that were once taken for granted.

Meanwhile, at the top of our society, we find a political and economic elite that – having reached the highest rungs – has pulled up the ladder behind itself, denying others the chance even to climb.

From Wall Street to K Street to Pennsylvania Avenue, we find special interests increasingly exempted and insulated – by law - from the rigors of competition and the consequences of their own mistakes.

All of this points to what really is an inequality crisis in America today – a crisis not of unequal wealth or income… but unequal opportunity.

Progressives, from the president on down, say that inequality in America today is a failure of the free market… resulting from insufficient government intervention.

But if you look closely, you start to notice… the opposite is true.

Today, many of Lincoln’s “artificial weights” and obstacles blocking his “paths of laudable pursuit” are themselves dysfunctional government policies.

It is government policies, after all, that trap poor children in rotten schools; poor families in broken neighborhoods; that penalize single parents for getting raises, or getting married.

It is government policies that inflate costs and limit access to quality schools and health care; that hamstring badly needed innovation in higher education; and penalize parents’ investment in their children.

This opportunity crisis is absolutely real – sadly it is just as real as the liberals’ flawed, seductive, big-government proposals to create their version of opportunity.

It is not enough for us simply to oppose liberals’ ideas. We have to propose conservative ones.

True victory for values voters may be found a little ways down on that road less traveled, but it’s long past time for conservatives to take it. Our movement is at its best when we take on big challenges.

And the great challenge of our time is the challenge of the forgotten family: the honest, noble parents across the country trying to make ends meet in a society, economy, and democracy increasingly rigged by Washington against them and their children.

It is time for a new conservative reform agenda that levels the playing field and finally meets the challenges facing working families:
  • to give underprivileged families a fair chance to work their way into the middle class;
  • to give families struggling to stay in middle class their fair chance to make a good living and build a good life;
  • to make it easier for couples for start families… for entrepreneurs to start businesses… and volunteers to start civic and charitable organizations;
  • to help all Americans at every step along the path to success overcome the obstacles big government has put before them.
It is time for a new approach to taxes, to not only lower rates to spur economic opportunity, but to eliminate tax discrimination against parents and families. I am working on a bill designed to do just that.

It is time for a new approach to education, to break up the special-interest cartels that hold back our young children, and our young adults. Education is opportunity, and government has no business telling students where they can and can’t go to get it.

It is time for a new approach to transportation. New roads mean new neighborhoods, new communities, new jobs, new families, and new opportunities.

Yet today, infrastructure money states could be spending on those opportunities, Washington instead spends on bureaucratic waste and special-interest giveaways.

It is time to rethink a dysfunctional welfare system that holds poor families down. And to reform a corrupt corporate welfare system that props big businesses up.

We need to find new ways – conservative ways that rely on free enterprise and civil society -- to help young couples:
  • get married,
  • afford a home,
  • raise and educate their kids,
  • get good health care,
  • take care of their elderly parents,
  • and retire with security themselves.
Our movement has always identified with those Americans who through hard work and determination have climbed the ladder of success. And we always should.

But our ideals demand we identify even more with those Americans still on the bottom rungs, where the climbing is harder, dangerous, and lonely.

We need to stand up for those Americans no one else will:
  • for the unborn child in the womb;
  • for the poor student caught in the failing school;
  • for the reformed father languishing in prison and the fatherless son facing alone the dangers of the street;
  • for the single mom working two jobs but still ensnared in big-government poverty traps;
  • for the elderly and the disabled, dehumanized by bureaucracy;
  • and for the splintering neighborhoods that desperately need them all.

These families, these moms and dads and grandparents and kids: they’re waiting for us.

They know more government isn’t the answer. They know government only divides them.

But they also know that too often… our party has ignored them.

That has to change.

And it has to change today… right now… because every hour, every day, big government leaves more and more American families behind.

It is time for conservatives to remember those forgotten families. In word and deed, in our hearts and in our agenda.

It is time to remember that the most audacious entrepreneurs in America are not high-tech CEOs in Silicon Valley… they’re a young couple at a church back home, saying “I do.”

It is time to remember that the most important investments in our nation’s future are not issued on Wall Street… but are sleeping in their mothers’ arms at the maternity unit of your local hospital.

To be truly pro-growth and pro-opportunity, our agenda must be truly pro-family.

Not just on some issues, but all of them.

I believe if conservatives look anew at the challenges facing the family, we will quickly discover opportunities to meet - united and undaunted - the challenges facing our movement… our economy… and our nation.

Building a new conservative agenda of reform around these moms and dads and kids – remembering America’s values and especially America’s forgotten families – is the path to restoring the greatness of our nation.

And if – at long last – conservatives finally take that road less traveled, it will make all the difference.

Thank you for everything you do. Keep the faith. And may God bless you all. (Source)


Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Lee Discusses Problems With Public Lands Highlighted By Shutdown

"Over the past week or so, it has become apparent that certain federal agencies have, in a number of instances, acted rather intentionally to cause what I would consider undue hardship for the purpose of making a political point…

"Another aspect of this problem is that there are some states that are by their very nature far more susceptible to this kind of manipulation and this kind of intentional infliction of pain than other states. While most states have within them less than 10 percent of federal land, meaning that while in most states less than 10 percent of the land is owned by the federal government, in 11 Western states, including my own, the government owns more than 50 percent of the land. In my state—the state of Utah—the federal government owns roughly 70 percent of the land. And while some may praise the benefits of public land, it’s clear that the federal government can and will use its immense power as a political tool. And I would add to this—public land becomes very unlike public land when it is closed by people who arbitrarily say “because of a shutdown we’re going to exclude you.” It becomes government land at that point, and that’s the point they seem to be making…"

"The bottom line here is that federal land management agencies exert enormous amounts of influence over the country, an influence that’s not often recognized by those outside the Western United States. This influence is not just in the national parks, it’s felt in many aspects of every day life in states like mine. It’s felt in how we fund public schools, how we maintain our police and our fire services, and how we develop our infrastructure. And as we’ve seen over the past week, these agencies are willing and able to wheeled tremendous influence in a manner that serves the political ambitions of the few, at the expense of the many. This raises a number of questions about the nature and extent of federally owned land, questions we need to address here in congress."

###

Copyright 2013. All rights reserved by Candace E. Salima.